Delegates at an education conference were recently
told that the front cover of Zoo
magazine sums up all that is wrong with Western society. Dr Helen Wright of St Mary’s Calne school in
Wiltshire told the The Institute of Development Professionals in Education that
the magazine was complicit in prematurely sexualising young people and
objectifying women.
“Is this what we want our young people to
aim for? Is this what success should
mean to them?” she asked.
Dr Wright is not the only person to have shared
her unease. Men’s magazines have been
making the news over the past few weeks; not because of their insightful
journalism or witty editorials but because of the effect they have had on our
culture.
Terri White was part of the team that
launched Nuts magazine and she
recently wrote about her experience for The
Guardian. She concluded that, whilst
these magazines didn't create
our sexualised culture, they responded to it, reinforced it and normalised it.
“We did too much damage” she wrote. “We told a generation of young men that a
woman's value lay in the pertness of her breasts and willingness to flash in a
public place… we told a generation of young women that it wasn't necessary to
get an education or build a career to improve your life. Just be willing to
bare your breasts.”
Ms White is not the only former lads’ mag
journalist to express her concerns. Loaded is the most notorious of the
‘lads’ mags’ which came to define the ‘lad culture’ of the 90s and noughties. The magazine’s former editor, Martin Daubney,
wrote of his concerns over what he had created.
He said that initially endless pictures of
topless women seemed like ‘harmless fun, dictated by market forces’ but he
‘never stopped to consider issues like the crass sexualisation of women.’ Looking back he now wonders whether Loaded was, in fact, a gateway to harder
pornographic magazines.
“We were normalising soft porn, and in so
doing we must have made it more acceptable for young men to dive into the murky
waters of harder stuff on the internet. And, for that, I have a haunting sense
of regret… maybe Loaded was part of
the problem. Was it an ‘enabler’ to young teenage boys who’d consume harder
porn later, in the same way dabbling with cannabis might lead to stronger
addictions to cocaine or heroin?”
As things stand magazines such as Zoo and Loaded have no age rating and can be bought quite legally by
children. Despite their sexually
explicit covers there are only voluntary codes governing the way in which they
are displayed.
Much progress has already been made to
protect children from publications like this – not least last year’s
announcement that the UK’s major supermarkets will now be covering up or
banishing magazines with sexually explicit covers. However, there is still a long way to go and
we look forward to making an impact in the future.
I could not agree more. While it is true that this situation has become more and more open in our society, it is also true that more younger girls are joining it.
ReplyDeletefilmes pornos