tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8131137942376227025.post1142155010931409305..comments2023-11-02T05:36:32.889-07:00Comments on Mediawatch-UK: A great week for child protectionMediawatch-UKhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12215885151457312646noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8131137942376227025.post-59686696592091585012013-06-18T10:39:50.052-07:002013-06-18T10:39:50.052-07:00The last poster has a point. When there is talk of...The last poster has a point. When there is talk of anything "Pro-Censorship" It's always the so-called Upper Classes who make these wild claims, distorted facts and other half-truths which fuel the populist Right-Wing press who always call for state censorship. Also to them it's always the working classes who they often despise. And make again. Very wild claims that stopping Consenting Adults doing what other Adults do to each other will somehow "Protect Children"<br /><br />Lastly, what concerns me greatly is that People and organisations such as yourself who want to impose limits to the Civil Liberties on Tax Paying, Voting Adults is the more I say "Sinister" issue that you are either representing or actually from an Ultra Conservative Christian Organisation. Who's desire to block Illegal Child Porn won't stop there, They could even block Blogs,Free Speech & Petitions that they do not agree with, Worse stilladvice about LGBT issues could be banned too!Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10107542069260528124noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8131137942376227025.post-40952733241402300492013-06-14T14:53:38.790-07:002013-06-14T14:53:38.790-07:00Yes these are exciting times . But only because it...Yes these are exciting times . But only because its been very funny to hear the numerous pro censorship arguments trotted out by you lot that are unproven hearsay based on nothing but your own ideologies . Don't you people get it yet ? In the 50's and 60's it was Hammer films , in the 70's it was porn , in the 80's it was video nasties and so on . Legislation tried to hide all these but legislation made no difference whatsoever . And trying to hide behind the argument that it's all about protecting children is as low as it gets. The idea that people like you think they can stop children from finding things on the internet they're not supposed to see is actually alarming in its level of stupidity. Young children can be protected by filters but PC savvy older children will find a way and you won't be able to stop them except in your dreamlike utopia that will never happen. <br />As for your stories- the "teen porn" thing is nonsense . Do you really think that had offenders not gained access to this material that they would have committed no crimes ? And for the 2 that do committ crimes there are millions who will view such content without committing crimes . And I expect the blinkered people you represent are completely clueless about the concept that giving airtime and publicity to offending and even illegal material makes it's availability more well known to those with such an interest who would never even have considered looking for it before those like you made its presence known to people of all ages. Get a grip and learn from history . Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com